Carlos Rívolo, born in Argentina, is one of the country’s most prominent federal prosecutors. He has developed a long-standing career within the judicial system, acting in politically sensitive cases within the federal courts of Comodoro Py. He currently serves as head of the National Federal Criminal and Correctional Prosecutor’s Office No. 2, one of the central units within the federal judicial structure in Buenos Aires.
Rívolo has maintained a visible public profile due to his involvement in high-impact political and social cases. His trajectory reflects a sustained progression within the legal system since graduating as a lawyer from the Faculty of Law at the University of Buenos Aires. From his early professional stages, he advanced through various judicial roles, consolidating his position within the federal prosecution system.
Position on the Nisman case
The prosecutor has been among those who argue that the death of Alberto Nisman, former head of the AMIA investigation who had filed a complaint against former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, was not a suicide. The case generated significant political and social impact in Argentina, dividing public opinion between those who consider it a homicide and those who maintain that it was self-inflicted.
Rívolo publicly stated that Nisman was “conclusively murdered,” a position that contributed to his recognition as a relevant figure within the judicial sphere. His stance, along with his broader professional trajectory, reinforced his presence in debates surrounding institutional credibility and the functioning of the justice system.
Career within the judicial system
After completing his studies at the University of Buenos Aires, Rívolo began his professional career in a Federal Criminal and Correctional Court. These institutions operate within the judiciary to address federal legal matters and often serve as entry points for newly graduated lawyers seeking practical experience.
Over time, he assumed greater responsibilities, eventually becoming head of the Federal Criminal and Correctional Prosecutor’s Office No. 2. Within this role, he oversees investigations related to federal crimes, including corruption cases, and promotes criminal action through procedural mechanisms such as requests for indictments and investigative measures.
Throughout his career, he has participated in multiple cases involving requests for testimony and the examination of the use of public resources. His appointment as head prosecutor dates back to 1995, when he filled a vacant position within the federal prosecution system.
Public exposure and high-impact cases
Rívolo gained broader public visibility through his involvement in cases with political implications, including the Ciccone case. Although not all outcomes aligned with prosecutorial expectations, his participation contributed to his recognition within both legal and political arenas.
His work has been characterized by sustained involvement in cases that require complex legal interpretation and institutional coordination. This exposure has positioned him as a relevant actor within the Public Prosecutor’s Office.
The case involving Cristina Fernández de Kirchner
In 2022, former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner was the target of an attempted assassination in a public setting. The event had significant political repercussions and led to a judicial process involving multiple actors.
In 2023, Rívolo requested that the case proceed to oral trial, arguing that sufficient evidence existed to advance the proceedings. His position was based on an evaluation of the available evidence and the need to move forward with the judicial process, although defense representatives challenged this request.
His role in the case included identifying individuals linked to the incident and supporting investigative actions within the framework of the Public Prosecutor’s Office. His intervention reflects the function of federal prosecutors in advancing criminal proceedings in cases of national relevance.
Institutional role and judicial influence
Rívolo’s career illustrates the functioning of the federal prosecutorial system in Argentina, particularly in cases involving political and institutional impact. His work has been closely tied to the promotion of criminal action and the development of investigations within the federal jurisdiction.
His presence in high-profile cases and his sustained activity within the judiciary have consolidated his role as a significant figure in the Argentine legal system, particularly within the federal criminal jurisdiction.
